New 
      Data will Help Ensure Protection of Children 
      August 2, 
      1999
      
      Action 
      In an effort to further 
      increase protections for infants and children, EPA is requiring 
      registrants of pesticides thought to have neurotoxic effects to conduct 
      acute, subchronic, and developmental neurotoxicity studies and submit the 
      results to EPA. These studies are designed to show the effects on the 
      nervous system of a chemical after a one-time or very short-term exposure 
      (acute), an exposure over an extended period of time (sub-chronic or 
      intermediate), and an exposure before or shortly after birth 
      (developmental).  
      This program to call in data 
      will apply to approximately140 pesticides and will be completed in phases 
      over the next several months. EPA expects to receive the first studies 
      within two years. This data call-in program was developed after seeking 
      advice from the Children’s Health Advisory Committee and the FIFRA 
      Scientific Advisory Panel. 
      
      Rationale for this Action 
      Many currently-registered 
      conventional food use pesticides have been observed to affect the nervous 
      system in humans and/or laboratory animals. There are outstanding 
      questions about these neurotoxic effects such as: 
      
        - 
        
Do these chemicals harm the 
        nervous system following exposure during critical stages of its 
        development, both before birth in the fetus, and after birth in infants 
        and young children? 
         - 
        
Are the effects in the 
        young different from those observed in an adult? 
         - 
        
If similar effects were to 
        occur in both the young and adults, would the young be more or less 
        sensitive than the adult to these effects?    
      The data developed in 
      response to this data call-in will help determine whether or not 
      differences occur because of age or stage of nervous system development. 
      The differences could be measurable (or quantitative) or descriptive 
      (qualitative). EPA will use these data in making decisions in the 
      implementation of certain aspects of the Food Quality Protection Act’s 
      tolerance-setting process, specifically in making the "reasonable 
      certainty of no harm" finding and addressing the requirement that "In the 
      case of threshold effects....an additional tenfold margin of safety for 
      the pesticide chemical residue and other sources of exposure shall be 
      applied for infants and children to take into account potential pre- and 
      post-natal toxicity and completeness of data with respect to exposure and 
      toxicity to infants and children. Notwithstanding such a requirement for 
      an additional margin of safety, the Administrator may use a different 
      margin of safety for the pesticide chemical residue only if, on the basis 
      of reliable data, such margin will be safe for infants and children." 
      (Section 402 (b)(2)(C)). 
      
      How EPA is Implementing this Action 
      EPA is mailing letters to the 
      affected pesticide registrants. These letters provide details about the 
      methods to be used in conducting the studies, as well as the schedule for 
      submittal of progress reports and results of the studies. 
      Registrants must notify EPA 
      within 90 days of receipt of the data call-in notice as to how they intend 
      to respond to the data requirements. Instructions about waivers from this 
      data call-in are provided for registrants who have been required to submit 
      these studies to EPA in the past, or who have voluntarily submitted these 
      studies to the Agency. 
      EPA is implementing the data 
      call-in in phases to ensure that data from the highest priority neurotoxic 
      pesticides are called in first and that the laboratory capacity available 
      to registrants is adequate to perform the studies within the required 
      timeframes. The cholinesterase-inhibiting organophosphates (e.g., 
      azinphos-methyl, chlorpyrifos, and diazinon) has been selected to be the 
      first chemical class to be called in, based on their known neurotoxicity 
      concerns. Additional classes of chemicals identified for later phases of 
      the data call-in are: 
      
        - 
        
Cholinesterase-inhibiting 
        carbamates. Examples include aldicarb, carbaryl, and 
        carbofuran. 
         - 
        
Thio- and dithiocarbamates. 
        Examples include mancozeb, maneb, and triallate. 
         - 
        
Pyrethrin and synthetic 
        pyrethroids. Examples include deltamethrin, fenvalerate, and 
        permethrin. 
         - 
        
Persistent organochlorines. 
        Examples include dicofol, endosulfan, and lindane. 
         - 
        
Formamidines: Examples 
        include amitraz, tridimefon, and tridimenol. 
         - 
        
"Mectins". Examples include 
        abamectin and emamectin. 
         - 
        
Phosphides (i.e., phosphine 
        generators). Examples include aluminum phosphide, magnesium phosphide, 
        and zinc phosphide. 
         - 
        
Organotins. Examples 
        include cyhexatin, fenbutatin oxide, and fentin hydroxide 
        (TPTH). 
         - 
        
Organoarsenicals. Examples 
        include disodium methanearsonate and cacodylic acid. 
         - 
        
Dipyridyl compounds. 
        Examples include diquat chloride, mepiquat chloride, paraquat bismethyl 
        sulfate/dichloride. 
         - 
        
Other neurotoxic 
        pesticides. Examples include carbon disulfide, imidachloprid, and 
        nicotine.   
      
       |